Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Borisov
Тема Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Дата
Msg-id CALT9ZEGWzCe4CSFh1BcyZegYmxBLBgM-aUUBNizcdnqHxGTqvw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators  (Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>)
Ответы Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Список pgsql-hackers
> I have only one thing to note: as this patch doesn't disable <^ and >^ operator for boxes the existing state of documentation seem consistent to me:
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <<| '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
>  f
>
> select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <^ '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
> ----------
>  t
>
> So I've only reverted the changes in the documentation on geometric functions in your patch.

You are right.  We need to keep the documentation for box operators,
but remove the lines for the point operators.

Indeed you are right. PFA v4 with documentation removed for <^ and >^ for point
Thanks!

--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Emre Hasegeli
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some doubious code in pgstat.c