Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Borisov
Тема Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17
Дата
Msg-id CALT9ZEFx4jJ47t-Vmz-jAVRrG+9TSP9uThDssbDHmWdsSjz5Fw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi and Happy New Year!

I've looked through the patches and the change seems quite small and justified. But at the second round, some doubt arises on whether this long patchset indeed introduces enough performance gain? I may be wrong, but it saves only several bytes and the performance gain would be only in some specific artificial workload.  Did you do some measurements? Do we have several percent performance-wise?

Kind regards,
Pavel Borisov

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Следующее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING