Hi, Alexander!
> > I have reworked that as per the attached, that provides basically the
> > same coverage, going through a SQL interface for the whole thing.
> > Like all the other tests of its kind, this does not use a TAP test,
> > relying on a custom configuration file instead. This still needs some
> > polishing, but the basics are here.
>
> Many thanks for the updated patch. I didn't know one can run tests
> with a custom postgresql.conf without using TAP tests.
>
> > What do you think?
>
> It looks much better than before. I replaced strcpy() with strncpy()
> and pgindent'ed the code. Other than that to me it looks ready to be
> committed.
I've looked through the patch again. I agree it looks better and can
be committed.
Mark it as RfC now.
Regards,
Pavel Borisov