Re: Non-decimal integer literals
| От | Zhihong Yu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALNJ-vT2qZ-hbfDAjutsYXfR+ga1-KMKtU2vRC0UtKbFeHCPfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Non-decimal integer literals (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Non-decimal integer literals
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:13 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On 16.08.21 17:32, John Naylor wrote:
> The one thing that jumped out at me on a cursory reading is
> the {integer} rule, which seems to be used nowhere except to
> call process_integer_literal, which must then inspect the token text to
> figure out what type of integer it is. Maybe consider 4 separate
> process_*_literal functions?
Agreed, that can be done in a simpler way. Here is an updated patch.
Hi,
Minor comment:
+SELECT int4 '0o112';
Maybe involve digits of up to 7 in the octal test case.
Thanks
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: