Re: proposal: schema variables
От | Zhihong Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALNJ-vQ9769F7B+6CyZ+StEqErafAYz_BcNYrHQdzTq3JmEV6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: schema variables (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: schema variables
(Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
This is continuation of the previous review.
+ * We should to use schema variable buffer, when
+ * it is available.
+ * it is available.
'should use' (no to)
+ /* When buffer of used schema variables loaded from shared memory */
A verb seems missing in the above comment.
+ elog(ERROR, "unexpected non-SELECT command in LET ... SELECT");
Since non-SELECT is mentioned, I wonder if the trailing SELECT can be omitted.
+ * some collision can be solved simply here to reduce errors based
+ * on simply existence of some variables. Often error can be using
+ * on simply existence of some variables. Often error can be using
simply occurred twice above - I think one should be enough.
If you want to keep the second, it should be 'simple'.
Cheers
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:25 AM Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> wrote:
Hi,I took a look at the rebased patch.+ <entry><structfield>varisnotnull</structfield></entry>
+ <entry><type>boolean</type></entry>
+ <entry></entry>
+ <entry>
+ True if the schema variable doesn't allow null value. The default value is false.I wonder whether the field can be named in positive tense: e.g. varallowsnull with default of true.+ <entry><structfield>vareoxaction</structfield></entry>+ <literal>n</literal> = no action, <literal>d</literal> = drop the variable,+ <literal>r</literal> = reset the variable to its default value.Looks like there is only one action allowed. I wonder if there is a possibility of having two actions at the same time in the future.+ The <application>PL/pgSQL</application> language has not packages
+ and then it has not package variables and package constants. The'has not' -> 'has no'+ a null value. A variable created as NOT NULL and without an explicitelyexplicitely -> explicitly+ int nnewmembers;
+ Oid *oldmembers;
+ Oid *newmembers;I wonder if naming nnewmembers newmembercount would be more readable.For pg_variable_aclcheck:+ return ACLCHECK_OK;
+ else
+ return ACLCHECK_NO_PRIV;The 'else' can be omitted.+ * Ownership check for a schema variables (specified by OID).'a schema variable' (no s)For NamesFromList():+ if (IsA(n, String))
+ {
+ result = lappend(result, n);
+ }
+ else
+ break;There would be no more name if current n is not a String ?+ * both variants, and returns InvalidOid with not_uniq flag, when'and return' (no s)+ return InvalidOid;
+ }
+ else if (OidIsValid(varoid_without_attr))'else' is not needed (since the if block ends with return).For clean_cache_callback(),+ if (hash_search(schemavarhashtab,
+ (void *) &svar->varid,
+ HASH_REMOVE,
+ NULL) == NULL)
+ elog(DEBUG1, "hash table corrupted");Maybe add more information to the debug, such as var name.Should we come out of the while loop in this scenario ?Cheers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: