Re: "unexpected EOF" messages

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vik Reykja
Тема Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Дата
Msg-id CALDgxVvf9DHUSr8DNRq1TQSoFxWrcFGPjm2OxyvRePr4n+uETA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: "unexpected EOF" messages  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: "unexpected EOF" messages  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to
> do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the
> logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're
> lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?

Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
user-specified message types.

Are you answering the "Would we consider" or the "would people object"?
 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages