On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:47 AM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, Tuesday, September 28, 2021 10:49 PM, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes this should not be supported, we should throw an error in this case.
> > This is handled in the v34 patch attached at [1].
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-
> > id/CALDaNm2Z9TfuoCf09YGKfwy7F1NwC4iCXJGTaZS%3DchH6VHtadQ%40mail.g
> > mail.com
> >
>
> Thanks for fixing it. I confirmed the error can be output as expected.
>
> Here is a problem related to publish_via_partition_root option when using this
> patch. With this option on, I think pg_get_publication_tables function gave an
> unexcepted result and the subscriber would get dual data during table sync.
>
>
> For example:
> (I used pg_publication_tables view to make it looks clearer)
>
> create schema sch1;
> create table sch1.tbl1 (a int) partition by range ( a );
> create table sch1.tbl1_part1 partition of sch1.tbl1 for values from (1) to (10);
> create table sch1.tbl1_part2 partition of sch1.tbl1 for values from (10) to (20);
> create table sch1.tbl1_part3 partition of sch1.tbl1 for values from (20) to (30);
> create publication pub for all tables in schema sch1 with(publish_via_partition_root=1);
>
> postgres=# select * from pg_publication_tables where pubname='pub';
> pubname | schemaname | tablename
> ---------+------------+------------
> pub | sch1 | tbl1_part1
> pub | sch1 | tbl1_part2
> pub | sch1 | tbl1_part3
> pub | sch1 | tbl1
> (4 rows)
>
>
> It shows both the partitioned table and its leaf partitions. But the result of
> FOR ALL TABLES publication couldn't show the leaf partitions.
>
>
> postgres=# create publication pub_all for all tables with(publish_via_partition_root=1);
> CREATE PUBLICATION
> postgres=# select * from pg_publication_tables where pubname='pub_all';
> pubname | schemaname | tablename
> ---------+------------+-----------
> pub_all | sch1 | tbl1
> (1 row)
>
>
> How about make the following change to avoid it? I tried it and it also fixed dual
> data issue during table sync.
>
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c
> index 04e785b192..4e8ccdabc6 100644
> --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c
> +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,8 @@ GetSchemaPublicationRelations(Oid schemaid, PublicationPartOpt pub_partopt)
> Form_pg_class relForm = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
> Oid relid = relForm->oid;
>
> - if (is_publishable_class(relid, relForm))
> + if (is_publishable_class(relid, relForm) &&
> + !(relForm->relispartition && pub_partopt == PUBLICATION_PART_ROOT))
> result = lappend_oid(result, relid);
> }
The suggested change works, I have modified it in the attached patch.
Regards,
Vignesh