Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От vignesh C
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CALDaNm2w8DvUorYGs0qGfDoHpZKfAe7nbH6GwZPGvZ7SxApehw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:29 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
One comment:
We can check if parallel_workers is within range something within
MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT.
+ int parallel_workers = 0;
+
+ if (optarg != NULL)
+ {
+ parallel_workers = atoi(optarg);
+ if (parallel_workers <= 0)
+ {
+ pg_log_error("number of parallel workers must be at least 1");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ }

Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anastasia Lubennikova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovery_min_apply_delay in archive recovery causes assertionfailure in latch