Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От vignesh C
Тема Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Дата
Msg-id CALDaNm2Q_uE0Ash_1LTbqDQGSEM-8e9wjtuJ0QKTVdKNG34JWg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 at 03:51, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 07:49:52AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > Thanks for the comment, the attached v3 version patch has the changes
> > for the same.
>
> -if (find_in_log(
> -               $node, $log_offset,
> -               qr/peer authentication is not supported on this platform/))
> +if ($node->log_contains(
> +               qr/peer authentication is not supported on this platform/),
> +               $log_offset,)
>
> This looks like a typo to me, the log offset is eaten.
>
> Except of that, I am on board with log_contains().

Thanks for fixing this.

> There are two things that bugged me with the refactoring related to
> connect_ok and connect_fails:
> - check_connect_log_contents() is a name too complicated.  While
> looking at that I have settled to a simpler log_check(), as we could
> perfectly use that for something else than connections as long as we
> want to check multiple patterns at once.
> - The refactoring of the documentation for the routines of Cluster.pm
> became incorrect.  For example, the patch does not list anymore
> log_like and log_unlike for connect_ok.

This new name suggested by you looks simpler, your documentation of
having it in connect_ok and connect_fails and referring it to
log_check makes it more clearer.

Regards,
Vignesh



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Morris de Oryx
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function
Следующее
От: Morris de Oryx
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function