Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm1Fx+zzudTi1aoE9nFef_p4H-qbOcvF9_qRanNLtwU-tA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 13:51, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Dear hackers, > > I've analyzed the issue, and this can always happen when --DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is > set on PG13. My suggestion is to remove the latter part of test on this branch. > > In the failed workload, we tested the case that one long transaction inserts a > tuple after the concurrent transaction does ALTER PUBLICATION ADD TABLE. > For PG14+ the change can be published, and PG13 it cannot be replicated because > the distributed inval messages cannot be executed during the transaction. That's > why we expected no results were output. > > So what if the -DDCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is set for the workload? relsync cache > can be discarded very frequently and backend process always read the system > catalog when it processes their changes. This means decoder can recognize that the > pg_publication has been updated and it can publish changes based on the altered > publication information. This behavior is opposite from normal. I agree with your analysis. > To fix the test failure, I suggest to just remove the case. Insert-after-commit > case has already been tested by above part of this file, so no need to do others. Alternatively I was thinking of a fix if it is possible to run this test conditionally when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is not defined, I was not sure if it is easy to do that and worth the effort for the PG13 branch. I'm ok with the proposed change. Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: