Re: SQL:2011 application time
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm0WoB+w4qz4n1ms3hTfLeRGzmUvBjRH0Weod5gsVpJ5hg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL:2011 application time (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 16:26, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 26.02.25 06:15, Paul Jungwirth wrote: > > > ON DELETE RESTRICT must be specified when PERIOD BUSINESS_TIME is > > also specified. > > > > Here are some patches removing support for RESTRICT > > I have committed this. > > I think this is about as much as we can hope to get done from this patch > series for PG18. I don't think the subsequent patches are ready enough. > As an example, the FOR PORTION OF still has the problem I mentioned at > <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4c5de4d-ff2d-4ef6-b7a2-1787dfa6427b%40eisentraut.org>, > and a few similar structural problems. Also, I see that you have > recently changed some things to make use of SPI, which seems > problematic. This needs much further analysis. > > My suggestions is to close the commitfest entry as "committed" and start > new threads and new entries for the subsequent features. I have marked this commitfest entry as committed based on your suggestion. It is better to start a new thread for the remaining work. Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: