On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:07 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 12:25 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 8:30 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:13 PM Tomas Vondra
> > > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, that is also true. So maybe at this, we can just rename the
> > > > > few types as suggested by you and we can look at it later if we
> > > > > anytime have more number of objects to add.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Apart from what you have pointed above, we are using
> > > "DO_PUBLICATION_REL_IN_SCHEMA" in pg_dump. I think we should replace
> > > that as well with "DO_PUBLICATION_TABLE_IN_SCHEMA".
> >
> > Thanks for the comments, the attached patch has the changes for the same.
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> I have only one minor comment:
>
> + PUBLICATIONOBJ_TABLE_IN_SCHEMA, /* Relations in schema type */
>
> I think the ' Relations' in the comments also need to be changed to 'tables'.
>
> The other part of the patch looks good to me.
Thanks for the comment, the patch at [1] has the changes for the same.
[1] -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm3g4ZaJ8h%3D16_A%2BytbyPUdJPaAz94YzQLqkD%3DyPu%2BVPwA%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Vignesh