Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
Дата
Msg-id CAL9smLAu8X7DLWdJ7NB0BtcN=_kCz33Fz6WYUBDRysWdG0yFig@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> But I'm generally against
> interfaces which put arbitrary restrictions on what power users can do on
> the basis that less experienced people might misuse the interface.

I agree with that as a broad principle, but disagree that it applies
here. Or if it does, then you have yet to convince me of it. In all
sincerity, if you think that I just don't understand your perspective,
then please try to make me understand it. Would a power user actually
miss ON CONFLICT DO SELECT? And if that's the case, would it really be
something they'd remember 5 minutes later?

I don't know, but I don't want to be limiting what people can do just because I can't come up with a use case.

In any case, others, feel free to chime in.


.m

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Emre Hasegeli
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results intovariables