Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Юрий Соколов
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Дата
Msg-id CAL-rCA0f7e96XKwHHa6TCNBdPBDC5XpeZ2BHV6pyp8-a2rTA=Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


2017-11-08 1:11 GMT+03:00 Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>:
>
> The same is true of unique indexes vs. non-unique.

offtopic: recently I'd a look at setting LP_DEAD in indexes.
I didn't found huge difference between unique and non-unique indices.
There is codepath that works only for unique, but it is called less
frequently than common codepath that also sets LP_DEAD.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()