Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Torsten Förtsch
Тема Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
Дата
Msg-id CAKkG4_ns-_88Rin7rShKDCxcNeb7xgXaydsrF3hQ0poY2jHBeg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
Thanks Tom

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote:
> Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as
> expected before 9.5.  No idea offhand what broke it.

The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(,
ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't.

Fix pushed.  Thanks for the report!

                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump and quoted identifiers
Следующее
От: Torsten Förtsch
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] vacuum freeze in 96