Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
От | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple primary key on partition table? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKcux6k9siTws5dXr3CKMSK1wuhaBO1q0g5DqMjw3xRK4FBjPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple primary key on partition table? (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:20 AM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:06 PM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nice catch Rajkumar.
>
> In index_check_primary_key(), relationHasPrimaryKey() called only for the an
> alter command but I think we need to call in this case as well, like this:
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
> index 7eb3e35166..c8714395fe 100644
> --- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
> +++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ index_check_primary_key(Relation heapRel,
> * and CREATE INDEX doesn't have a way to say PRIMARY KEY, so it's no
> * problem either.
> */
> - if (is_alter_table &&
> + if ((is_alter_table || heapRel->rd_rel->relispartition) &&
> relationHasPrimaryKey(heapRel))
> {
> ereport(ERROR,
>
> Thoughts?
>
Here is the complete patch proposes the aforesaid fix with regression test.
Thanks, This worked for me.
Regards,
Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: