Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackups and slots

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Feike Steenbergen
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackups and slots
Дата
Msg-id CAK_s-G1jexrnoAbywM1EMORb1ECpfk8PP_msw=rfhPC8njNaCA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackups and slots  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
> but -X stream is, then we use a temporary slot always.
This seems even more useful with -X fetch to me, as with fetch we are sure we
are not immediately receiving the WAL. So, I'd propose to use it whenever -X
is specified, regardless of which method is specified.

> (I still think we should change the default here, but that's a different topic)
+1

> Does that seem reasonable? Or would people prefer it to default to off?
Yes. Users are specifically requesting wal using -X, so making sure that actually happens by default would work.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)