Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:36 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:

Hi Tomas,

> Do you have any suggestions regarding the column names in the new view?
> I'm not sure I like node_id and page_num.

They actually look good to me. We've discussed earlier dropping
s/numa_//g for column names (after all views contain it already) so
they are fine in this regard.
There's also the question of consistency: (bufferid, page_num,
node_id) -- maybe should just drop "_" and that's it?
Well I would even possibly consider page_num -> ospagenumber, but that's ugly.

-J.