Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
От | Jakub Wartak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKZiRmwr=M5VqGSW8_xrWyUz_ChdRtFU=8Bow+zzgbZ6av4oMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 9:02 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for taking a look. I've pushed the patch to increase the > default effective_io_concurrency. Cool, anything > 1 is just better. Just quick question, so now we have: #define DEFAULT_EFFECTIVE_IO_CONCURRENCY 16 #define DEFAULT_MAINTENANCE_IO_CONCURRENCY 10 Shouldn't maintenance be now also at the same value (16) instead of 10? Also, fc34b0d9de27 (5 years ago by Thomas) states about m_io_c: "Use the new setting in heapam.c instead of the hard-coded formula effective_io_concurrency + 10 introduced by commit 558a9165e08.", so there was always assumption that m_io_c > e_io_c (?) Now it's kind of inconsistent to see bitmap heap scans pushing more IOPs than recovery(!)/ANALYZE/VACUUM or am I missing something? No pressure to change, just asking what Your thoughts are. -J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: