Re: failed NUMA pages inquiry status: Operation not permitted
| От | Jakub Wartak |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: failed NUMA pages inquiry status: Operation not permitted |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKZiRmwV_O73DdSosD-k62kS2wWPc3C8mRZY8j9ozfOu5OLLjg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: failed NUMA pages inquiry status: Operation not permitted (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: failed NUMA pages inquiry status: Operation not permitted
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 11:30 PM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Re: Tomas Vondra
> > I guess the only solution is to accept -2 as a possible value (unknown
> > node). But that makes regression testing harder, because it means the
> > output could change a lot ...
Hi Tomas! That's pretty wild, nice find about that swapping s_b thing!
So just to confirm, that was reproduced outside containers/docker,
right?
> Or just not test that, or do something like
>
> select numa_node = -2 or numa_node between 0 and 1000 from pg_shmem_allocations_numa;
Well, with the huge-pages it should be not swappable, so another idea
would be simply alter first line of src/test/regress/sql/numa.sql and
sql/pg_buffercache_numa.sql just like below:
- SELECT NOT(pg_numa_available()) AS skip_test \gset
+ SELECT (pg_numa_available() is false OR
current_setting('huge_pages_status')::bool is false) as skip_test
\gset
(I'm making assumption that there are buildfarm animals that
huge_pages enabled, no idea how to check that)
-J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: