Re: Reported type mismatch improperly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andy Fan
Тема Re: Reported type mismatch improperly
Дата
Msg-id CAKU4AWrHetoQQHA1JJC1-NT=rBmS7=6xx7nC0QZtAoD3OR7SFg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reported type mismatch improperly  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Reported type mismatch improperly  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения


On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:28 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, July 17, 2020, Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:23 AM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:

- which they still need to be aware of even though this patch removes one situation where it matters.

Can you provide an example of this?  If it is not very troublesome,  I'd like to fix both.

Nothing concrete off hand, more of an impression.

David J.

Improve some comments and test cases, and submit it https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2653/ . 


--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
Вложения

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Дата:
Сообщение: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Следующее
От: Tobias Völk
Дата:
Сообщение: Improvement for query planner? (no, not about count(*) again ;-))