Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andy Fan
Тема Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey
Дата
Msg-id CAKU4AWqrLvEWgwOM3G8tdsS7Bz2nS=G3VfskFArHt1Pmu0Mc1w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey
Список pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:34 AM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:29 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:17, Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote:
> V6 also includes:
> 1.  Fix the comment misleading you mentioned above.
> 2.  Fixed a concern case for `relation_has_uniquekeys_for` function.

Over on [1], Richard highlights a problem in the current join removals
lack of ability to remove left joins unless the min_righthand side of
the join is a singleton rel. It's my understanding that the reason the
code checks for this is down to the fact that join removals used
unique indexed to prove the uniqueness of the relation and obviously,
those can only exist on base relations.  I wondered if you might want
to look into a 0003 patch which removes that restriction? I think this
can be done now since we no longer look at unique indexes to provide
the proves that the join to be removed won't duplicate outer side
rows.

Yes, I think that would be another benefit of UniqueKey,  but it doesn't happen
until now.  I will take a look of it today and fix it in a separated commit. 
 
I have make it work locally,  the basic idea is to postpone the join removal at
build_join_rel stage where the uniquekey info is well maintained.   I will test 
more to send a product-ready-target patch tomorrow. 

# explain (costs off) select a.i from a left join b on a.i = b.i and
    b.j in (select j from c);
  QUERY PLAN
---------------
 Seq Scan on a
(1 row)

 Best Regard
Andy Fan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Suraj Kharage
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019