Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Arthur Zakirov
Тема Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Дата
Msg-id CAKNkYnzpMwx0KtLCaOoFVGQZoJHJ5E+mTrZGEcary0eKu2LdLg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
2017-03-28 19:31 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>:
> On 28 March 2017 at 12:08, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, I didn't notice that, sorry - will fix it shortly.
>
> So, here is the corrected version of the patch.

Thank you!

The patch looks good to me. But it is not applied :) I think it is
because of new FTS functions for jsonb. The patch need rebasing.

But, from my point of view, it would be nice if the code mentioned
earlier was improved:

> + foreach(l, sbsref->reflowerindexpr)
> + {
> + List *expr_ai = (List *) lfirst(l);
> + A_Indices *ai = (A_Indices *) lfirst(list_tail(expr_ai));
> +
> + subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(list_head(expr_ai));

It is necessary for arrays of course because of logic mentioned in the
documentation.

> If any dimension is written as a slice, i.e., contains a colon, then all dimensions are treated as slices. Any
dimensionthat has only a single number (no colon) is treated as being from 1 to the number specified.
 

But it would be better if SubscriptingRef structure had a new field of
List type. This field can store list of booleans, which means is there
slices or not. I think it can improve readability of the code.

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BRIN de-summarize ranges
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb