Re: RE-SQL tests for Roles & Resource Group nodes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Murtuza Zabuawala
Тема Re: RE-SQL tests for Roles & Resource Group nodes
Дата
Msg-id CAKKotZR9_Z-VwvuJs+1EXrWGDV-6sZDA6_81d3gTdRSb9i1ORg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RE-SQL tests for Roles & Resource Group nodes  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы Re: RE-SQL tests for Roles & Resource Group nodes  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Hi,

PFA updated patch with corrections in the print messages.

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:36 PM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Hi

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:35 AM Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi Murtuza

I have tested the patch and I think below string should be modified:
Server(Type: #ppas) is not supported for the Resource Groups module - Skipped
Server version(120000) is not supported for the Resource Groups module - Skipped

It misleads, that server type 'ppas' is not supported for the Resource Group, it should be changed to "Resource groups are not supported by PG - Skipped". Similarly for version string should be ''Resource groups are not supported by PPAS server less/greater than <server version>"

Agreed.
 

Please note that our framework considers test cases from all the modules as one single test case, If we need module wise detailed summary report for the reverse engineered SQL tests then we may have to change the framework.

We're just treating all the re-sql tests as one test in the higher-level suite. Maybe we'd want to change that in the future, but I think it's fine for now.
 


Regards,
Murtuza


On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 5:52 PM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Hi

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:17 AM Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
++ Attaching patch

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:46 PM Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi Dave,

Please find the updated patch,

- Added a mechanism to check for supported minimum/maximum version and a server type in the framework.

There's still a problem with this I'm afraid - it says in the summary that the re_sql test cases were all skipped, which is not the case. I think we should just skip the irrelevant tests in the re_sql module, but not mark the entire module as being skipped:

=============Running the test cases for 'Regression - PG 11'=============

runTest (regression.re_sql.tests.test_resql.ReverseEngineeredSQLTestCases)

Reverse Engineered SQL Test Cases


Create IMPLICIT Cast

Alter IMPLICIT Cast

Drop IMPLICIT Cast

Create EXPLICIT Cast

Alter EXPLICIT Cast

Drop EXPLICIT Cast

 ... skipped 'Server(Type: #ppas) is not supported for the Resource Groups module'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ran 1 test in 0.480s


OK (skipped=1)


======================================================================

Test Result Summary

======================================================================


Regression - PG 11:


0 tests passed

0 tests failed

1 test skipped:

ReverseEngineeredSQLTestCases (Reverse Engineered SQL Test Cases)


======================================================================
 
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


--
Thanks & Regards
Akshay Joshi
Sr. Software Architect
EnterpriseDB Software India Private Limited
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246


--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgAdmin][RM4335] Add EXPLAIN option SETTINGS and SUMMARY
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: pgAdmin 4 commit: Add more comprehensive feature tests for the data gri