Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f_tU-eHX0zRnBzn-g9gtdToBPkP+nBtkd_7oxZgBK86-Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 14:40, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 02:34, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see that there are already a test for zero column table in test_fourth_table_zero_col
> > and if am not wrong table_index_stats is empty table
>
> Maybe Fabien would like to see a test that dumps that table with
> --rows-per-insert=<something above one> to ensure the output remains
> as the other test.  I think it might be a good idea too.

This patch was failing to build due to the new extra_float_digits
option that's been added to pg_dump.  It was adding an additional case
for 8 in the getopt_long switch statement. In the attached, I've
changed it to use value 9 and 10 for the new options.

I also went ahead and added the zero column test that Fabien
mentioned. Also added the missing backslash from the other test that
had been added.

Fabien also complained about some wording in the docs. I ended up
changing this a little bit as I thought the change was a little
uninformative about what rows won't be restored when an INSERT fails.
I've changed this so that it mentions that all rows which are part of
the same INSERT command will fail in the restore.

I think this can be marked as ready for committer now, but I'll defer
to Fabien to see if he's any other comments.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonpath
Следующее
От: Dmitry Belyavsky
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ltree syntax improvement