On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 18:57, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/11/26 14:25, David Rowley wrote:
> > I'm making efforts to delay per-partition work even further in the
> > executor, for example locking of the per-partition result relations
> > until after run-time pruning would be a significant win for
> > partitioned tables with many partitions when generic plans are in use.
> > Moving things back to InitPlan() flies in the face of that work.
> >
> > [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/1778/
>
> That's an interesting point. Although, considering the concerns that Tom
> raised about the same index relation being locked such that lock-strength
> upgrade occurs (his example containing two CTEs), we'll have to find a way
> to do the ModifyTable run-time pruning such that result relations and
> their indexes (possibly under multiple ModifyTable nodes) are locked with
> RowExclusiveLock before they're locked with AccessShareLock lock as scan
> relations. For example, we might be able to find a way to do the
> ModifyTable run-time pruning in InitPlan before initializing plan trees.
I thought my idea of the processing the rangetable at the end of
planning to determine the strongest lock per relation would have
solved that.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services