Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
От
David Rowley
Тема
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Дата
Msg-id
CAKJS1f9iTdeViQf7VMfEPFmWr7VaA2qdoN1kPRN8tQiJVWkesA@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered (Alvaro Herrera)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
On 9 May 2016 at 14:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > David Rowley wrote: >> On 9 May 2016 at 13:20, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> > It's not a buildfarm machine, but a machine setup specifically for >> > coverage reports. It runs "make check-world" only. I can add some >> > additional command(s) to run, if somebody can suggest something. >> >> I'm not familiar with what's possible with make check-world, but would >> it be reasonable to make that just do another regression test run with >> force_parallel_mode set to regress? > > My suggestion isn't to change what "make check-world" does; it's just to > change the script in the coverage machine so that it runs some other > command after "make check-world" and before "make coverage-html". I understand what you meant. I was just taking the suggestion one step further as I thought that if you were adding that for the coverage test then it might actually also be a good idea that it occurred in make check-world. The parallel tests are quite thin as it is, so perhaps its a good idea to get more machines running through the parallel code. pg_regress seems to support --temp-config, so we could just have a config file which has; max_parallel_degree = 2 and force_parallel_mode = regress. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления