On 7 April 2018 at 15:41, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm also wondering how come we had hash partitioning before and
> did not have this sort of problem. Is it just that we added a
> new test that's more sensitive to the details of the hashing
> (if so, could it be made less so)? Or is there actually more
> platform dependence now than before (and if so, why is that)?
We didn't prune HASH partitions before today. They were just all returned.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services