Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f9TATZvSheK0mxyK7iMeaji5gqFMqUCfiRBO1c23O5GrQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 30 March 2018 at 18:38, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Please find attached the updated patches.

Thanks.

I've noticed that there are no outfuncs or readfuncs for all the new
Step types you've added.

Also, the copy func does not properly copy the step_id in the base
node type. This will remain at 0 after a copyObject()


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Следующее
От: Marina Polyakova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors