Re: BUG #15882: Select .... UNION ALL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: BUG #15882: Select .... UNION ALL
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f9ELmqOHz4dGc9a_t+0=x9q+zvjvRVvL-A3b92-ydH6Cw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15882: Select .... UNION ALL  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 21:22, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> It occurs to me you are likely benefitting from the new parallel query infrastructure here.

Yeah, most likely.

It can be disabled globally by changing enable_parallel_append = off
in postgresql.conf. However, relying on the query outputting rows in
some order without an ORDER BY clause is asking for trouble. It looks
as though there are only 13 rows to sort, so I don't think an ORDER BY
will cost much.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Manuel Rigger
Дата:
Сообщение: GROUP BY and inheritance issue
Следующее
От: Ilya Galdin
Дата:
Сообщение: [libpq] Segmentation fault when call PQfinish inside singletone pattern