On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 15:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Pushed that one. I'm interested by the "POC" patch, but I agree
> that it'd take some research to show that it isn't a net negative
> for simple queries. It sounds like you're not really interested
> in pursuing that right now?
Thanks for pushing it.
I'm still interested in the POC patch. I just knew it wasn't something
for the back branches and thought something that was would be more
important... Things having gone quiet here wasn't a good source of
inspiration to do any further work on it. It's good to hear you're
interested.
> Anyway, I rebased the POC patch up to HEAD, just in case anyone
> still wants to play with it.
Cool. Thanks.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services