Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f95f=6L7sbWLexJ7nJEKcvXoM_GTTvv4KBGCCJR7haZ+Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 17 August 2017 at 01:20, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> Looks reasonable. I edited the comments and the variable names a bit, to my
> liking, and committed. Thanks!

Thanks for committing. I've just been catching up on all that went on
while I was sleeping. Thanks for handling the cleanup too.

I'll feel better once pademelon goes green again. From looking at the
latest failure on it, it appears that your swapping of
pg_atomic_write_u64 for pg_atomic_init_u64 should fix this. My
apologies for that mistake.

-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows isbroken
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Function to move the position of a replication slot