Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f92THmtoU5Mm+_ZFzgOqrQVaAwECsc9nrX1J_RRGr6xKA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 16 November 2017 at 15:54, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Anyway I added __attribute((noinline)) to the two
> functions and got the following result.
>
>> bms_add_range in 1.24 (12.4 ns per loop)
>> bms_add_range2 in 0.8 (8 ns per loop)

I see similar here with __attribute((noinline)). Thanks for
investigating that. Your way is clearly better. Thanks for suggesting
it.

-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Treating work_mem as a shared resource (Was: Parallel Hash take II)
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.