Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f8ivT-=UdnsPxFq+hTi4QrspdCdtBZ8T7LtBUPJHv_uEw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Список pgsql-hackers
Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at this.

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 03:03, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> As for the latest version (v8-0001-...) I've only caught a small typo: "When
> the first subpath needs sorted ...". It was probably meant "... needs sort
> ...".

That was a sort of short way of saying "needs [to be] sorted". I've
added in the missing "to be" in the attached.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shawn Debnath
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql display of foreign keys