Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f8idTGrak7BLxp6-O27vvERm9xybT4xS6gjTSKVGUgZ=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Список pgsql-hackers
On 17 January 2018 at 03:58, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> 9. Error details claim that p2_a_idx is not a partition of p.
>> Shouldn't it say table "p2" is not a partition of "p"?
>
> You missed the "on" in the DETAIL:
>   DETAIL:  Index "p2_a_idx" is not on a partition of table "p".
> You could argue that this is obscurely worded, but if you look at the
> command:
>    ALTER INDEX p_a_idx ATTACH PARTITION p2_a_idx;
> nowhere is table p2 mentioned, so I'm not sure it's a great idea to
> mention the table in the error message.

I think I did miss the "on".

>> 10. You've added code to get_relation_info() to handle partitioned
>> indexes, but that code is skipped [...]
>> The new code should either be removed, or you should load the index
>> list for a partitioned table.
>
> That's a leftover from previous versions too.  YAGNI principle says I
> should remove it rather than activate it, I think, since the optimizer
> is not going to use the data for anything.

Agreed.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP Patch: Precalculate stable functions, infrastructure v1
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use