Re: open/lseek overhead with many partitions (including with "fasterpartitioning pruning")
| От | David Rowley |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: open/lseek overhead with many partitions (including with "fasterpartitioning pruning") |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKJS1f8DjC+iWH4CCeChN0=cS8=U+t9JBnVoH6sz=dVhnUbRYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | open/lseek overhead with many partitions (including with "fasterpartitioning pruning") (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: open/lseek overhead with many partitions (including with "fasterpartitioning pruning")
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 April 2018 at 07:46, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > TLDR: even with "faster pruning" patch, pg11dev open()+lseek() every file > backing every table being queried, even for those partitions eventually > "excluded". Yeah, this will no doubt be due to the fact that we still build RelOptInfos in the planner for all partitions, so we're still doing get_relation_info() and estimate_rel_size() for each of those. It might be possible to delay that call until we know we're going to need the partition. I imagine we wouldn't need to know the size of the relation until after set_rel_sizes, but I've not checked. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: