Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f8AuJvM49KnnCMbvN5nCD0fwEa6pyKJysB7QLnKfun=sQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Список pgsql-hackers
On 19 February 2018 at 18:01, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 19 February 2018 at 15:11, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> and perhaps we should do s/isproxy/is_proxy/ which seems like the usual
>> naming for boolean variables.
>
> You're right. I'll change that and post an updated patch. I'll also
> reprocess your email again and try to improve some comments to make
> the intent of the code more clear.

I've made a few changes to the patch. "isproxy" is now "is_proxy".
I've made the comments a bit more verbose at the top of the definition
of struct AppendPath. Also shuffled some comments around in allpaths.c

I've attached both a delta patch with just these changes, and also a
completely new patch based on a recent master.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench - allow to specify scale as a size
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning