Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 06:24, Robert Haas  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:09 PM Tom Lane  wrote:
> > Sergei Kornilov  writes:
> > >> Ugh, I guess so. Or how about changing the message itself to use
> > >> INFO, like we already do in QueuePartitionConstraintValidation?
> >
> > > Fine for me. But year ago this was implemented in my patch and Tom voted against using INFO level for such purpose: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1142.1520362313%40sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > What I thought then was that you didn't need the message at all,
> > at any debug level.  I still think that.  It might have been useful
> > for development purposes but it does not belong in committed code.
> > INFO (making it impossible for anybody to not have the message
> > in-their-face) is right out.
>
> I find that position entirely wrong-headed.  If you think users have
> no interest in a message telling them whether their gigantic table is
> getting scanned or not, you're wrong.  Maybe you're right that
> everyone doesn't want it, but I'm positive some do.  We've had
> requests for very similar things on this very mailing list more than
> one.

If we don't have this for SET NOT NULL then we should either add it or
remove the one from ATTACH PARTITION.  I don't think we need to decide
which it is now, so I've added an item to the open items list that
this is out for debate.

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items#Open_Issues

I think we can mark this patch as committed now as I don't think the
lack of a way to test it is likely to cause it to be reverted.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services