Re: Some memory allocations in gin fastupdate code are a bit brain dead

On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 05:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't think this is quite bulletproof against overflow, especially
> in view of the rather careless mixing of int32 and uint32 variables
> that exists here.  The easiest way to make it bulletproof is to add
> an explicit test, so I did that and pushed it.

Thanks for tidying that up and for pushing.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services