On 3 August 2018 at 17:58, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/07/31 16:03, David Rowley wrote:
>> Maybe we can do that as a follow-on patch.
>
> We probably could, but I think it would be a good idea get rid of *all*
> redundant allocations due to tuple routing in one patch, if that's the
> mission of this thread and the patch anyway.
I started looking at this patch today and I now agree that it should
be included in the main patch.
I changed a few things with the patch. For example, the map access
macros you'd defined were not in CamelCase. I also fixed a bug where
the child to parent map was not being initialised when on conflict
transition capture was required. I added a test which was crashing the
backend but fixed the code so it works correctly. I also got rid of
the child_parent_map_not_required array since we now no longer need
it. The code now always initialises the maps in cases where they're
going to be required.
I've attached a v3 version of your patch and also v6 of the main patch
which includes the v3 patch.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services