Re: csv format for psql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: csv format for psql
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbuO_WdHp1qS2QtG7FqSsV_nHwum06QdJ7=KuzWycvHZg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: csv format for psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: csv format for psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sunday, June 3, 2018, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

\pset fieldsep ;
\pset format csv

I don't like when one command overwrite settings of some other command. We can introduce some similar like GUC where default values from configure file can be overwritten by custom setting for session. So I am able to thinking about some settings

like

\pset csv_default_separator
\pset csv_default_header

Then there is question to simplify all and use \pset csv_separator, and csv format independent of fieldseparator value? It is possible, but I don't think so have more option for similar value is good idea (for interactive mode).

Having a dedicated option seems infinitely better than adding new settings for defaults and having to keep track of whether the shared field separator is a default versus a user specified value.

Recently we reworked server GUCs to avoid this kind of unset/default behavior.  I don't see how introducing or relying upon it in psql would be an advantage.

At this point -1, keep the status quo, for any implementation that tries to make the unaligned mode field separator perform double duty.  I'm open, but unlikely, to be convinced that it can be done without unforeseen bad side effects and degraded usability.

David J.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Следующее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018