Re: New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbpsKddGNf7J_bDHNd3cepv-YTPE=+xOd9-A+goYjaYxg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: New 'pg' consolidated metacommand patch  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:19 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
I'd also appreciate +1 and -1 votes on the overall idea, in case this entire feature, regardless of implementation, is simply something the community does not want.

-1, at least as part of core.  My question would be how much of this is would be needed if someone were to create an external project that installed a "pg" command on top of an existing PostgreSQL installation.  Or put differently, how many of the changes to the existing binaries are required versus nice-to-have?

David J.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN