Re: Clarity Bug for Schema Permissions, Potential Vulnerability?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Clarity Bug for Schema Permissions, Potential Vulnerability?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbkD5eStnCSsZZiRWZoWBviWG5x-0jz6L-ZmBg2T6tmjw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Clarity Bug for Schema Permissions, Potential Vulnerability?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:38 AM Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
I think a more useful change (if any) would be a NOTICE or WARNING when granting privs on a object in a schema, to a user who does not already have privs on the schema itself.

Definitely not a warning but maybe a notice.  But if that's the extent of things I don't really see enough value to warrant having a command targeting one object go looking around the system for other related state to comment upon.  If one revokes usage on a schema should we inform the user of any remaining grants on contained objects?  I suspect there are other useful notices to consider beyond those two.  It feels like something better left to a third-party tool rather than something built into core.

David J.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Clarity Bug for Schema Permissions, Potential Vulnerability?
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function