Re: Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbf685z2Do41OzMaW5B4X9+t-h6hCKRGFC=srB3TVqbgw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?  (Ivan Voras <ivoras@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:29 AM Ivan Voras <ivoras@gmail.com> wrote:
Out of curiosity, since there's CREATE TEMP VIEW, any particular reason there's no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW?

Seems like it could be similar to a temp table.

Probably a lack (absence) of use cases resulted in people deciding (or defaulting) to not spend any effort in that area.  Incremental maintenance and refresh seem considerably less useful when only the current session can see the table.  Temp views and temp tables seem to provide sufficient options in the session lifetime space.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ivan Voras
Дата:
Сообщение: Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?
Следующее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why no CREATE TEMP MATERIALIZED VIEW ?