Re: Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbaQGcwpVayCu2GaX-Ja4Uno9koToBnnbKO8Lb75SDcyw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-docs
On Friday, April 27, 2018, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication-publication.html
Description:

In section 31.1 it says "A publication is a set of changes generated from a
table or a group of tables"... that seems wrong. It's a set of relations,
tables, whatevers. No the changes themselves. Right?

It's correct.  The subscriber receives ongoing "events" which are the logical changes to all tables defined within the publication.  The items of interest are the ongoing changes, the list of tables is just a table of contents for which change sets are present.

David J.

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Appendix A. PostgreSQL Error Codes
Следующее
От: Alexander Kjäll
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation for CommandComplete is incorrect for CREATE TABLEwith server version 10.2