Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwba2iFVyLb3+Jab5ruWdPxNqBCFVFMDeCdmT_hVUYm43w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Non-committer reviews: is it helpful? (Alexander Borisov <lex.borisov@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 3:07 PM Alexander Borisov <lex.borisov@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a question for the community. While waiting for feedback on my
own patches, I was wondering: is there value in me reviewing other
people's patches, even though I am not a committer here?
Non-committers moving patches from "needs review" to "ready for committer" is a critical activity here. It is part of the soft contract one enters into when authoring patches - to try and perform an amount of review work equivalent to what you are asking from others.
As for which ones to review - everyone has their own natural prioritization methodology (and capabilities) just by interacting with the project and community. I'd suggest you don't overthink things and just do what feels right to you.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: