Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I'm going to mark this as rejected. Here's a possible doc patch
>
> Maybe s/strictly/ordinary/, or some other word?  "strictly"
> doesn't convey much to me.  Otherwise seems fine.
>

How about:

While the COALESCE, GREATEST, and LEAST functions below accept a
variable number of arguments they do not support the passing of a
VARIADIC array.

?

David J.