Re: [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbCm+exABos=jKGMOzm85CDWzsgVd-AcCPkx80dBte=TA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на temporary table vs array performance  ("dbyzaa@163.com" <dbyzaa@163.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:18 AM, 邓彪 <dbyzaa@163.com> wrote:
we have to do dml in temp table,the CTE is not fit

 
​Moving this to -general only...​

​Please direct all replies to the list.

You are asking for help but not providing any context for what your requirements are.  You are not likely to get good help.

Best case, supply a working function (self contained test case) that does exactly what you need it to do but uses a temporary table and performs badly.  Lacking that at least attempt to describe your problem and not just point out that creating temporary tables is expensive.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance
Следующее
От: Márcio A. Sepp
Дата:
Сообщение: RES: Chante domain type - Postgres 9.2