Re: BUG #14025: Unable to validate constraints
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14025: Unable to validate constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwaeauH0AyNvtuTho=xQJ3DBKz42vxje9mf8wCMzB=_QSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14025: Unable to validate constraints (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thursday, March 17, 2016, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > jan.kort@genetics.nl <javascript:;> writes: > > When I do: > > - disable trigger all > > - incorrect foreign key reference > > - enable trigger all > > - validate > > Then I get no error, I was expecting an error. > > AFAIK, disabling a foreign key trigger is not supported; if you do it, > we give absolutely zero guarantees about the subsequent behavior of the > foreign key. > > ALTER TABLE VALIDATE CONSTRAINT is not meant to fix that. It is meant > to finish up a foreign key addition started with > ALTER TABLE ... ADD FOREIGN KEY ... NOT VALID. > > Documented in the relevant sections here. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/interactive/sql-altertable.html We technically support disabling FK (an internal constraint) triggers but it's intended usage is to bulk load known good data into tables without the overhead of validation when you already known it is good. The system as a rule only performs validation on data when newly inserting it (under MVCC semantics). The few instances of stated re-evaluation operate on explicitly deferred constructs created using (in this case at least) NOT VALID. Once an FK has become valid it is never expected to become invalid again. While there isn't any particular reason we couldn't validate any named constraint there is little incentive to make that particular change given these operating assumptions. And in the rare case you need the ability it can usually be had in some other way. David J.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: