Re: gin index postgres 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: gin index postgres 9.2
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwaaN9LbWczj_HgTY-Zk_ixVsfCT0V_q+y4-dsyza3O1PA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: gin index postgres 9.2  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: gin index postgres 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:42 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Lucas Possamai <drum.lucas@gmail.com> wrote:
yes.. I thought too.

the results r still different 

​What's the query with the revised parentheses?


​Never mind...your right I doubt that it should matter.

What I would do is remove the whole "count(DISTINCT)" part and select * - and then add a LIMIT 10 and an ORDER BY to both the before and after.  If we see the data it might help to explain the behavior.

It could be a bug...but you'd need to provide a self-contained script so that someone else can confirm.

David J.
 

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: gin index postgres 9.2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: gin index postgres 9.2